Home
   |   Catalog
   |   News   |   Current Customer   |   New Account   |   Print a Form   |   Contact Us
 

Product Catalog
INDEX




NEW PRODUCTS & NEWS ALERTS
[ Click to See NEWS ALERTS Below ]

NEW PRODUCTS

The NEW PLR PATIENT EDITION fits into your
shirt pocket or purse, is easily carried while doing
hospital rounds and covers all of life's issues.


email us: info@clintpharmaceuticals.com

PLEASE RE-ORDER AS NEEDED

Order your FREE
PHYSICIAN'S LIFE REFERENCE

or the NEW
P
ocket-Sized
P
LR Patient Edition


Two fresh new Biblical resources, provided free of charge to physicians and nurses in an effort to give you, your staff and your patients practical solutions to life's challenges.

All physician's offices are welcome to as many copies as desired.

Please contact us at 800.677.5022
and we will send your copy of our PLR immediately.


zofran


TOP    |    HOME


BULLETIN BOARD / NEWS ALERTS


1) SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE INVESTIGATION

Who's Mixing Your Drugs?
Bad medicine: Pharmacy mix-ups - a recipe for misery.
Some drugstores operate with very little oversight.

See The SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE: June 23, 2002


: : : RELATED STORY : : :

"No one at (Walnut Creek) Pharmacy admits responsibility. Doc's co-owner says he agreed to surrender his pharmacist license to avoid trial."

See The SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE: June 23, 2002


2) INFORMATION RELATING TO DANGERS OF COMPOUNDING:
See DRUGTOPICS.COM: July 2nd, 2001 for more information.


3) A NOTICE TO PHYSICIANS REQUIRING BENZYL ALCOHOL FREE REPOSITORY CORTICOSTEROIDS:

Currently there are only two (2) FDA approved Corticosteroids WITHOUT Benzyl Alcohol as a preservative. Those products are DEPO-MEDROL(R) 40 and 80 mg in the 1ml vial and CELESTONE SOLUSPAN(R) in the 5ml vial.The DEPO-MEDROL(R) in the 1ml vial is a single dose vial where the CELESTONE SOLUSPAN(R) is a multidose. DEPO-MEDROL(R) does come in a mutlidose vial, but the product contains Benzyl Alcohol.

-Schering stopped production of CELESTONE SOLUSPAN(R) during the early part 2001 but has resumed limited production recently. During the period of time when production of CELESTONE SOLUSPAN(R) was haulted, this led to the increased usage of DEPO-MEDROL(R) in the 1ml as well as the multidose vials.

CLINT PHARMACEUTICALS now carries CELESTONE SOLUSPAN(R) in limited quantities -call for availablility. We also have plenty of the multidose vials of DEPO-MEDROL(R) and KENALOG(R) in stock, and we are giving a priority to physicians who need alcohol free steroids. We will ship to these physicians first as they order CELESTONE SOLUSPAN(R) now that it has become available in limited quantities.

Though it is uncertain, it seems to be propriatary information at the manufacturing level that is causing these backorder problems to occur.

We at CLINT PHARMACEUTICALS will do EVERYTHING in our power to provide our customers with plenty of product.


4) A NOTICE FROM ASIPP

(The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians):

-FDA To Take Action Against Pharmacies That Compound Drugs As If They Were Drug Manufacturers

________________________________________

American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians
"The Voice of Interventional Pain Medicine"
2831 Lone Oak Road, Paducah, KY 42003
Tel.: (270) 554-9412; Fax : (270) 554-8987
E-mail:drm@asipp.org

From: Laxmaiah Manchikanti, M.D.
Date: 7/18/2002
Courtesy of:  William Sarraille, J.D.,  Arent Fox
________________________________________

In June 2002 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") published a new section in its Compliance Policy Guide ("CPG") Manual, CPG 460.200, outlining the Agency's enforcement policy on pharmacy compounding. The Guidance details the types of compounding that could be the subject of FDA enforcement action following the recent Supreme Court decision in Thompson v. Western States Medical Center.
POLICY
In general, the FDA will consider enforcement action when the scope and nature of a pharmacy's actions resemble those normally associated with drug manufacturing. Specifically, the Agency said that it will take enforcement action when a pharmacy engages in:

* Compounding drugs before actual receipt of a valid prescription;

* Compounding drugs that were removed from the market for safety concerns; approved drugs without an investigational new drug application;

* Receiving, storing, or using drug substances without first obtaining written assurance from the supplier that they were made in an FDA-registered facility;

* Receiving, storing, or using drug components not guaranteed to meet official compendia requirements.

* Compounding drugs using commercial-scale equipment;

* Compounding drugs for resellers who sell to individuals or who offer the drugs wholesale;

* Compounding drugs that are copies of FDA-approved drugs (in certain cases FDA may permit pharmacies to compound a small quantity of a drug if it is slightly different than an approved drug); and/or;

* Activities that violate state pharmacy laws.

Enforcement action could include any or all of the following: warning
letter, seizure, injunction, and/or criminal prosecution.
BACKGROUND
In 1992 the FDA issued a CPG, formerly designated CPG 7132.16, which detailed the FDA's enforcement policy on pharmacy compounding. In 1997, President Clinton signed into law the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 ("FDAMA"), which added section 503A to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ("the Act"). Pursuant to section 503A, drug products compounded by a pharmacist or physician on a customized basis for individual patients were exempted from the Act's adulteration provisions concerning compliance with current good manufacturing practices, misbranding provisions requiring adequate directions for use on labeling, and new drug provisions. Section 503A also prohibited compounders from soliciting prescriptions for compounded drugs and prohibited compounders from advertising specific compounded drugs. FDAMA's compounding provisions superceded FDA's 1992 CPG.

In November 1998 seven compounding pharmacies filed suit in a Nevada District Court and claimed that the solicitation and advertising provisions of section 503A violated the First Amendment because the provisions were impermissible restrictions of commercial speech. The U.S District Court ruled in favor of the pharmacies. The FDA appealed the District Court's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In February 2001 the Court of Appeals declared not only that the solicitation and advertising provisions of section 503A were unconstitutional, but that the entire section, which allowed compounding under certain circumstances, was unconstitutional (Western States Medical Center v. Shalala). The government appealed the adverse decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. In April 2002 the Supreme Court upheld the Ninth Circuit's finding that section 503A was an unconstitutional restriction on commercial speech (Thompson v. Western States Medical Center). Therefore, presently section 503A in its entirety is invalid. In response, FDA published CPG 460.200 in an effort to clarify the time at which the Agency will take enforcement action against compounders.

[PRINT THIS NOTICE]

TOP    |    HOME




.....
   
 

Home   |   Catalog   |   News   |   Current Customer   |   New Account   |   Print a Form   |   Contact Us


   © Copyright 2005 - Clint Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
   629 Shute Lane, Old Hickory, TN 37138
   E-Mail Us: <customersupport@clintpharmaceuticals.com>

Site Design & Management:
Carl Design Group
Nashville, TN